§ 7 – The inalienability clause provided for in this article does not prevent the use of land as security for loans related to the activity for which the property is intended. (Included in Interim Measure No. 910, 2019) (Completion time) Another aspect that is still being discussed is the period of occurrence of conflicts, which is taken into account for inspection purposes and also for the issuance of securities. For example, Law 11.952/2009 limits regularization to professions that were carried out in a soft and peaceful manner until 2004. However, if property was the target of conflicts by the country after 2004, such as the occupations of social movements, it is not yet clear whether this fact would exclude property from the possibility of regularization. According to Terra Legal`s coordinator in Marabá, Pará, these cases are being evaluated in collaboration with the agricultural court and had not yet been resolved as of February 2010 (Reis, 2010b). 7. Disclosure of Securities Issued. The transfer of public assets to private assets must be carried out in accordance with the principle of transparency of public administration. This includes disclosure of the amount charged for the land in titled properties. 2. Event of all agencies interested in the areas of activity of the programme.
Agencies with potential interests in areas to be regulated (e.g. Funai and Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation – ICMBio) must be consulted before the country is titled. The thirty-day time limit is incompatible with the reality of the work of these bodies. In order to facilitate and expedite this process, we recommend that the agencies concerned form a working group to address interests and conflicts in each situation to be resolved. I – up to© a tax minimum – ten per cent of the minimum value of the agenda for bare earth securities for securities financing and regularization purposes; Figure 10. Percentage distribution of the 276 land titles issued in 2009 by municipality. In this context, the Federal Government issued Provisional Measure (PM) 458/2010, which was later converted into Law 11.952/2009. This legal framework allows the land regularization of occupations in EU countries in the legal Amazon up to 15 tax modules with a border of 1,500 hectares. To implement this legislation, the federal government launched the Terra Legal program in June 2009. Prior to Law 11.952/2009, the government had already promoted specific changes to make the land regularization process more flexible and facilitated, given the large accumulation of titling requests in Incra offices since the 1980s. This accumulation occurred mainly for two reasons: the change of priority in the implementation of Incra and the lack of a legal framework to regularize properties over 100 hectares. However, the discussion on MP 458/2009 was marked by several criticisms and resistance that earned it the name of MP of Grilagem in relation to the practice of misappropriation of public lands in the Amazon.
The MP has set up several bodies for the regularization of illegal possessions, such as reductions in land prices and long-term payment terms. As a result, critics have pointed out that the MP may encourage continued illegal appropriation of public lands (Brito & Barreto, 2009a). II – above one and up to four tax standards – between© ten and thirty per cent of the minimum value of the agenda for bare land values for the purposes of ownership and regularisation of financing, according to the form and coefficients set out in Annex I and Annex III respectively; In addition, each state has a state executive group with functions similar to the IEG, but at the local level (Figure 2). In general, these groups are formed by the coordination of the State of Terra Legal, some State departments (e.g. the Secretariat of the Environment), the Land Agency, the State Representation of the Rural Extension and Technical Assistance Society (Emater) and the Regional Centre of Sipam. In the United States, Terra Legal has also established a social monitoring group composed of local representatives of civil society, the MPF and the Public Prosecutor`s Office (MPE), as well as other agencies. The frequency of meetings of these groups is not fixed. § 4 º In the hypothesis of the non-existent agenda of the values of the prices of the bare land in the region referred to in § 1 °, the octos and the institutions of the federal public administration will rightly use as a reference the price evaluations produced preferably by the public institutions. Therefore, the methods of estimating the amount to be calculated for the regularization of land through Terra Legal and the financial costs that will affect this amount have not yet been defined. This is an issue that should continue to be debated in the second half of 2010 and whose resolution will be crucial to assess the continuity and credibility of the programme among squatters but also before monitoring bodies and civil society.
The land regularization movement gained momentum after the federal government attempted to increase the amount of land owned by re-registering rural land in 2004. As a result, in 2005, the first signs of a relaxation of land regularization rules began to emerge with the increase in the area limit for regularization without tender.